Skip over navigation

Help

Eyes Wide Shut on DVD (1999)

Eyes Wide Shut cover art
Play Eyes Wide Shut trailer
Average rating: 57%
263131120111225
2.5
from 2,632 members
 
Starring: Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Madison Eginton, Jackie Sawris, Sydney Pollack
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Run time: 159 mins
Certificate: 18
User collections: The South by Southbank Film List, Films that stand out from the crowd, I love these films but hey everyone has different taste, Marmite Movies, The Greatest Films of All Time, The Greatest Films by the Greatest Directors, My Collection at Home, IMHO best movies I have seen
Genres: Thriller
Languages: English
Released: 10/09/2001
Also Available on:  Also Available on: BLU-RAY  Also Available on: DIGITAL  Also Available on: HD-DVD

Brief synopsis of Eyes Wide Shut

Stanley Kubrick's final film is a mature, highly intelligent, thrilling masterpiece of sexual obsession and marital (in)fidelity. Tom Cruise stars as Bill Harford, a doctor who becomes obsessed with a sexual fantasy that his wife, Alice (Nicole Kidman), confesses to him. Although the fantasy (involving a naval officer) occurred only in Alice's mind, Bill can't get it out of his own head; his obsession leads him through a series of potential sexual encounters, each one surrounded by the specter of death. His whole world threatens to unravel as he falls deeper and deeper into a web of mystery, lies, and deceit.
Kubrick's film breathes with vivid blues, reds, and blacks, the threat of illicit sex and death lurking around every corner. Cruise and Kidman, who are married in real life, are utterly convincing as a happy couple suddenly forced to reexamine their faith in each other. Sidney Pollack, Todd Field, Julienne Davis, Marie Richardson, and Vinessa Shaw sparkle in minor roles. Based on the novella TRAUMNOVELLE by Arthur Schnitzler, EYES WIDE SHUT is a brilliant examination of the psychological nature of sex and marriage, of faith and faithlessness, of obsession and desire. Kubrick said that his last film (he died shortly before the film opened) was 'my best film ever'; while that is debatable, there is no doubting that the film is a splendid finale to a glorious career.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 3 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Full of trademark themes and characteristic compositions, Stanley Kubrick's final film is also his most fascinatingly flawed. With its style often resembling 1970s European art house movies, it lacks the morbidity to pass as a Buñuelian satire, and is too stately and serious to succeed as a commercial enterprise. Tom Cruise — as the doctor recklessly seeking a means of avenging his wife's fantasised infidelity — is far too controlled for his character's fraught nocturnal adventures to be plausible. Nicole Kidman, as his wife, is less visible, but simmers with potential erotic danger. Despite expectations, this is a disappointingly conservative conclusion to a career spent pushing back cinematic boundaries. Perhaps, after so long without directing a movie, Kubrick cared too much.

Rating of 2 
	  stars out of 4 Halliwell's Film Guide

An atmospheric account of sexual jealousy, temptation and fidelity, meticulously made and with an oddly dreamlike quality about it; but, while being faithful to its slim source, it is also overlong and much too portentous.

Variety

"...Riveting, thematically probing, richly atmospheric....A deeply inquisitive consideration of the extent of trust and mutual knowledge between a man and a woman..."

See all 6 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsPerhaps Kubrick's masterpiece?

robertcoxwell from London , 25/11/2004

Those who loathe Eyes Wide Shut are also those who hate reading novels. "Dude, like too many words..."

Marketing executives at Warner Bros. are to blame for this film's poor reception, though it's a masterpiece. EWS was billed as Hollywood sexiest movie, ever! Cruise, Kidman. Sex, extra marital sex, group sex. Kidman is naked a minute into the film! Reminded me of the same anorak-pervs who flocked to 'Sex, lies and videotape' only to discover...

Rather EWS is beautiful, dangerous, funny... I could fill a forest in Peru and still run out of space for superlatives.

Pick a theme - fidelity. There's the password, but notice that in most scenes there's a gold band. From Cruise's wedding ring to gold bands around lamp shades, vases and circular gold picture frames.

And the orgy, allusions to secret societies and Satanic ritual. At Ziegler's party Alice dances with Sandor Szavost. (The founder of the Satanic church was Szandor.) Was Szavost at the orgy? And Alice as well? Is that how Bill's mask appears? And what symbolism in the colour red? And why Shostakovich?

These questions will never be properly answered, as we'll never know what made that woman grin when Da Vinci painted her.

The comparison isn't spurious. There are those who see the painting in the Louvre and wonder "that's the fuss about the painting that's so small anyway".

Much the same as "what's the fuss of some film that's too long, not even sexy".

  32 out of 42 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsWeird

Nick ussell from Surrey, UK. , 10/08/2006

Oh what to say, I am still somewhat dazed by it all. A very strange film that I can imagine will not be everyone’s cup of tea.

For the first 80 minutes it is quite slow and my opinion was that the film was purely done to show naked women, very pleasant women, but all a bit pointless. The film at this point made me sit up and concentrate. I suddenly felt I was watching a totally different film full of intrigue. It is definitely a thriller in it category, but not your standard type. Not much can be said about the plot without destroying the mystery of the film so I won't try.

One to recommend? Not sure, it depends on your taste, a lot on naked women, suggestive sexual action that is almost pornographic. To sum up, if you can handle, or the nudity doesn't bother you, or even if that is what you are looking for, then you will probably enjoy this weird film. Good acting on the whole, and a plot that never really explains itself fully, leaving you wondering just what it was all about.

  24 out of 37 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsdifficult to slot

arun from liverpool , 29/01/2005

it was difficult to pause or stop the movie inspite of the slow pace. speilberg was right in the special features interview when he said stanley kubricks movies are difficult to pause or stop. the film has many layers to it and one can come up with lots of questions after the end.

the work by the director is effortlessly top class.

Tom Cruise struggles to put in the correct expressions.

Nicole is relatively better.

The visuals are stunning.

Its difficult to slot this film - erotica, psychological thriller.

It incites to look out for the directors other works.

Film is essentially a directors medium and this film reinforces that. The super stars pale in comparison with him.

  15 out of 16 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsA killer thriller!

A customer from uk , 05/11/2004

I was surprised to see the negative reviews above for this film, because for me it was superb.I think Kubrick died during the making...which may explain the ending.

Very clever the way the plot builds throughout and develops into a very scary,tense piece of moviemaking.If you just want the same-old you probably wont enjoy, but if you like original,atmospheric,thought provoking stuff..this ones for you.Oh yes..no soundtrack has been this scary since 'Halloween'...

  10 out of 11 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 1 starsHard to believe this is a Kubrick

amandathepanda from West of Scotland , 08/09/2005

This is a very slow film which I believe is mis-titled as a thriller - as there was no thrill. Tom Cruise is not believable and I thought I was watching a made-for-TV movie from 1974 with very wooden sex scenes. Sorry.

  2 out of 3 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 stars

Teresa#11 from LONDON , 19/08/2004

I wish I could give this no stars - but I suppose the actors deserve one for showing up to the set every day. If this was Kubrick's 'pet project' the mind boggles. It was fairly predictable, very tacky, not the least erotic and the equivalent of a short story stretched over 2 and a half hours.

  2 out of 3 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews