Skip over navigation

Help

Clockwork Orange on DVD (1971)

Clockwork Orange cover art
Play Clockwork Orange trailer
Average rating: (71%)
12143111320613
3.5
 
Starring: Malcolm McDowell | Patrick Magee | Michael Bates | Warren Clarke | Adrienne Corri | Miriam Karlin | David Prowse | John Savident
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Run time: 131 mins
Certificate: 18
User collections: Eclectic-Fantastic | Crabsticks | Dark films about death, life and our eternal pessimism. | Films that make you say "wow..." | Made in Britain | Jessy's all time greats | The Most Overrated Films Of All Time | Superb Films of the 1970's | The most important movie film list available to humanity. | Best Of British.
Genres: Drama
Languages: English
Subtitles: English
Released: 10/09/2001
Also Available on:  Also Available on: BLU-RAY  Also Available on: HD-DVD

Brief synopsis of Clockwork Orange

From its opening shot of Malcolm McDowell staring with evil intent directly into the camera (which pulls back to reveal him drinking a glass of milk), Stanley Kubrick's brilliant CLOCKWORK ORANGE announces itself as a completely new kind of viewing experience. Banned in Britain for decades, the film, set in an unidentified future, overwhelms the senses with its almost comic depictions of rape and violence set to an upbeat classical and pop music score; its magnificent, colorful, futuristic set designs; and its utter determination to shock, frighten, and thoroughly entertain its audience. Kubrick based his chilling masterpiece on Anthony Burgess's culture-shaking novel about a young man, growing into adulthood, who has a bit of a problem with authority figures. (Interestingly, Burgess's stunning piece of fiction contains 21 chapters, but Kubrick ends his film after chapter 20.) When Alex (a career-defining performance by McDowell) and his droogs go out for a little bit of the old ultraviolence, he is caught and forced to undergo controversial treatment that will make it impossible for him to commit violent acts--but has severe side effects. Kubrick's film purposely confuses crime and punishment, cause and effect, hero and villain, irony and satire, filled with oxymoron and paradox, taking on science, politics, societal mores, education, sexual awakening, and parental responsibility all in a new language (both verbal and visual) that would change the cinema forever. No one who has seen it has ever been able to hear "Singin' in the Rain" or Ludwig van again in quite the same way.

Screenshots

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 3 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Unseen between 1974 (when Stanley Kubrick himself quietly withdrew it) and 2000 (after his death), it is little wonder that an inflated degree of mythology surrounds this notorious futuristic drama. Dramatised from the 1962 Anthony Burgess novella about anarchic yobs (“droogs”) in a dystopian future, it was shocking then and it's shocking today, particularly the scenes of rape and sadistic “ultraviolence” in the first half. Burgess and Kubrick may have been making intellectual points about the state and free will — Alex (Malcolm McDowell) is brainwashed into submission in the film's more ponderous second half — but the film doesn't quite live up to the masterpiece status that unattainability has bestowed on it. Fascinating and prescient, yes, and its moral ambiguity is brave, but it's really only essential viewing for cineastes and film students.

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 4 Halliwell's Film Guide

Kubrick's fantastic meditation on a violent future has seemed more prescient with every passing year. In extraordinary images of clown-like delinquents, he orchestrates to electronic music mindless street violence, which leads to mindful state violence a

See all 2 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsUltra violent & high impact, despite its age

A customer from Harleston, Norfolk , 15/09/2003

Beethoven's 9th (or is it 5th?) will never sound quite the same again after this film. Futuristic thuggish violence, including some blood-curdling sexual assaults, in an utterly surreal setting. Showing its age - well pre mobile phones - this film nonetheless shows you how differently you can portray the future from Sleepers or Minority Report. The film was banned for years but is nonetheless (accordingly?) a cult classic - and deservedly so.

  21 out of 27 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsWhat is it with TO reviewers and Kubrick?

rostokov from london , 13/01/2005

'A sexless, inhuman film, whose power derives from a ruthless subordination of its content to the demands of telling a good story.' This is a nonsensical criticism. I thought good storytelling was a laudable ideal. The film doesn't really even subordinate its content, ie: Burgess' novel, it is a remarkably lucid adaptation, masterfully transforming Burgess' poetic prose into a cinematic symphony riffing on the theme of individual free will V's society.

It is only 'inhuman' if one is willing to believe that the primal urges its protagonist displays aren't human impulses, for good or bad. It is not my favourite Kubrick film, (I find the ending a little inadequate), but its still a powerful film that demands to be seen.

  19 out of 22 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsOutstanding

DryIce from Cambridgeshire , 18/10/2003

This film is definitely not for everyone. I truly believe it's one of those 'love it or hate it' creations, and being a Kubrick film that's not entirely surprising. It carries on a bit, it isn't easy watching by any means, but by God! it paints a vivid picture.

This film wasn't banned: it was withdrawn by Kubrick himself due to copycat killings shortly after its 1971 release. 'A Clockwork Orange' is more shocking than violent, about a young man and his chums who get high in the most languidly mellow bar you've ever seen, and go about driving fast and committing sexual offenses. Essentially it's about bored teenagers in 70's England who get their kicks in varied ways, and unlike many allegedly shocking films of past decades [The Exorcist, Texas Chainsaw Massacre etc], this one still hits hard, still touches a raw nerve, still makes you think.

It's elaborate, it's outrageous, and the 'Singing in the Rain' scene is one of the most memorable in cinema history.

Like I said, it's not everyone's cup of tea, but this will certainly invigorate you, and open your eyes wide.

  13 out of 16 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsStill disturbing

Gaffer1 from Glasgow , 05/08/2004

I have heard about this film for many years but now seeing it for the first time I was riveted by it. It's violent, disturbing, yet haunting. It's also a challenge to the liberal penal code reformists and a challenge to our values as a society - do we let "these people" back on to our streets or is the corrective philosophy the only genuine means of making society a safer place? The acting is superb and the scary atmosphere is sustained throughout. Well worth viewing- thought provoking.

  12 out of 15 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews