Skip over navigation

Help

Kagemusha on DVD (1980)

Kagemusha cover art
Average rating: (74%)
11122111120411
3.5
 
Starring: Tatsuya Nakadai | Kenichi Hagiwara | Takashi Shimura | Daisuke Ryu | Tsutomu Yamazaki
Director: Akira Kurosawa
Studio: 20TH CENTURY FOX HOME ENTERTAINMENT
Run time: 153 mins
Certificate: PG
User collections: It came from the East | Samurai Films | Samurai Cinema | Palme d'Or Winners | cool films from around the world
Genres: Action/Adventure | Thriller | World Cinema
Languages: Japanese
Hearing-impaired: English
Subtitles: Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish
Released: 03/06/2002
Also Available on:  Also Available on: DIGITAL

Brief synopsis of Kagemusha

In this dazzling epic from Akira Kurosawa, a petty thief named Kagemusha (Tatsuya Nakadai) gets saved from a death sentence because he resembles the warlord Shingen Takeda (also Nakadai). The warlord has been fighting two other leaders for control of 16th-century Japan and impersonators often take his place during battles to put him out of harm's way. Because of Kagemusha's strong physical similarities to the warlord, he's a perfect choice for a "shadow warrior." However, the arrangement suddenly changes when Shingen gets fatally wounded while watching a battle. Adhering to Shingen's final wish, the warlord's men keep the death a secret, and Kagemusha struggles to transform himself from a criminal into a leader.
KAGEMUSHA marked a welcome return for the legendary director, who had not made a movie since 1974. Nakadai, a supporting player in earlier Kurosawa films, expertly portrays the leading role(s), almost always filled in the past by Toshiro Mifune. KAGEMUSHA also features the final screen appearance of longtime Kurosawa actor, Takashi Shimura. In order to help the film get an international release, Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas served as executive producers.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 4 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Returning to direction after a five-year lay-off, the 70-year-old Akira Kurosawa proved that none of his powers had diminished with this sprawling, almost Shakespearean tale of court intrigue. Set during the civil wars of the 16th century, this is the most expensive picture ever made in Japan and won the Palme d'Or at Cannes. Admittedly, it could stand some judicious cutting and one or two of the set pieces smack of scale for spectacle's sake. But Tatsuya Nakadai is outstanding as the thief who becomes a puppet ruler, while Kurosawa's use of colour and his camera control are faultless.

Variety

"...A sweeping epic of the times of clan wars in 16th century Japan....Tatsuya Nakadai is extraordinary..."

New York Times

"...[Kurosawa's] most physically elaborate, most awesome film, full of magnificent views....Majestic..."

See all 3 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 stars A real masterpiece

Bobnessuk , 16/03/2005

The explosion in CGI technology has meant it is now possible to show battle scenes with ..ooh..trillions of people. Trouble is, with one notable exception, they?ve looked just like sophisticated video games.

This film, made in 1980, was filmed in the old fashioned way and it far surpasses any of the CGI brigade in terms of realism and beauty. Kurosawa was only working with a few hundred extras yet he conjures up cinematic images - the retreating army silhouetted against a blood-red sky springs to mind - that remind you film can be an art-form. My biggest regret is that I wish I?d seen this on the big screen, The DVD copy is a fine wide-screen transfer but it can?t match the real cinematic experience.

The film is not without its faults; narrative structure was never the directors? strong-point. Some of the action is confusing, the acting is very theatrical in comparison with western styles, some of the characters behave inconsistently and there?s no sense of time in the thing ? the grandson doesn?t grow up at all in the three year time period; but, then again, this is not what the film is about.

Kurosawa doesn?t move his camera very much. In contrast with the edit and zoom ridden western way, the viewer is able to appreciate the glorious vistas he puts in front of them.

Some of you may find the film slow and theatrical, while others will love it to the level of pretentiousness (I know), but you can?t ignore its magnificence or, indeed, its relevance.

Just watch ?Lord of the Rings? ? the notable CGI exception I mentioned at the beginning. There are at least a couple of sequences in ?Kagemusha? that appear in almost identical fashion in Peter Jackson?s work. Methinks Mr Jackson owes Kurosawa a lot.

  6 out of 6 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsNot Kurosawa's greatest

Tinderbox from England , 04/06/2004

Aside from some interesting uses of colour (deep and rich reds pervade nearly every scene) and the occasional memorable set-piece, there's not much to recommend in Kurosawa's penultimate epic "Kagemusha".

Whereas his final film "Ran" proved masterful in its combination of epic, poetic samurai battles and internal conflict, this film never really does well at either. The tale centres on the double of a powerful warlord, who suffers a severe identity crisis after being taken to the top of the political food chain and then unceremoniously booted out.

The plot isn't too bad, and certain scenes, such as the dream sequence and the profoundly moving finale, get close to the genius Kurosawa is frequently capable of.

However, the battle scenes aren't very involving, and the middle section of the film seriously drags without really offering anything to mull over.

It's worth a look, but is nowhere near as essential as Kurosawa's early classics or his final swansong.

  6 out of 7 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsHard Work

Toejam from East London , 25/10/2004

I love Kurosawa?s work but this film was hard work. I found that the likenesses between the lord, his brother and the double made it hard to follow things at first. Add to that the subtitles, and finally that way the scenes were drawn out meant I was exhausted after watching this, but I guess in a way that is what it was all about. Great story, great performances, but I would have liked to have seen a bit more character development, which seemed to take a back seat to the action, mainly the battles.

  5 out of 5 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 stars

Sam#36 from TANSLEY , 08/03/2004

Another masterpiece! The obvious large budget and high profile of this film separates it from kurosawas earlier films but i am undecided to whether it improves it, Its alot grander than his other films and is on more of an epic scale but this causes some loss of simplicity that his earlier films pulled off very well, the plot can also get rather confusing in parts due to subtitles and the large quantity of japanese names to remember. However this film has the heart of a kurosawa film, with careful observation of human nature and morality playing a key part and the lead character (only know as 'the double') is acted and portrayed superbly. Thus the audience builds up a strong connection with the film and its characters, making the breathtaking conclusion of the film all the more affecting and powerful.

  5 out of 6 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews