Tideland on DVD (2005)

Sarah Pottle from Essex, England , 26/01/2007

Described by Gilliam as “Alice in Wonderland meets Psycho” – this poetically faithful, low budget adaptation of Mitch Cullin’s novel, is arguable his most disturbing and distinctive film to-date. Bold and original, this painful odyssey within a lonely child’s imagination has a strange awkward beauty that will not be to everyone’s taste. Gilliam’s approach to visual language is radical; he is prepared to take enormous risks while paying attention to the smallest texture and details. When it pays off, as it does in the accurate sense of scale of this tiny female narrator’s inner world - it is a wondrous achievement.

Jeliza Rose (Jodelle Ferland) sits inside the topsy-turvy landscape of an upturned bus, conversing with a chorus of disembodied Barbie doll heads. Although this, the first of many dark claustrophobic interiors, may briefly light up with CGI generated firefly fairies, rest assured, this is not Disney. Jeliza’s train wreck of a family swiftly derails any romanticised notions of childhood. After her abusive, bloated, chocoholic mother (Jennifer Tilley), dies of a methadone overdose, Jeliza and her drug addled, aging, rock star father (Jeff Bridges) set off in true fairy tale style to grandma’s house. However, grandmas’ long dead, the house a dilapidated ruin and now after his last hit father rigidly stares at the wall while emitting strange smells.

Cast adrift in the wild oceanic beauty of the surrounding Saskatchewan prairies and Pecorini’s ravishing widescreen lensing, Jeliza appears shipwrecked in an Andrew Wyeth painting. Emotionally and physically starving Jeliza encounters a talking squirrel, an eccentric taxidermist in a black beekeeper’s bonnet (Janet McTeer) and the brave sea captain and slayer of the monster shark (Brendan Fletcher). The most authentic testament of a child’s attempt to survive neglect and abuse, and affecting exploration of the consequences of using fantasy as a coping mechanism since TARNATION.

  29 out of 33 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Hanna Natalia from greater manchester , 26/08/2006

WOW! this film, just as Gilliam warns, will really divide opinion. whilst certainly containing some of the most horrifying, even digusting, scenes i have ever witnessed, it is surreal,and at times, enchanting, to attract the audience as it repels. there is some stunning imagery and breath-taking fantasy woven through the repulsive spectacle of rotting corpses and suggestion of necro and peaodophilia and the obvious unease, to understate ridiculously, of watching a child near starve to death. not for everyone. whether you see this or not, you'll probably regret it.

  21 out of 24 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Bonyman from London , 15/03/2007

Dear Mr Gilliam.

You introduced this film with an announcement. Some of us weren't going to like what we were about to see. Damn right (and not a great way to set up your audience).

So let's look at the reasoning for your apology - the film we were about to see is seen through the eyes of a child, or a child's imagination if you like. Great, I can accept that. As we grow older, we lose sight of what it is to be a child, to see the world with such innocence. No, not me, not got a problem with that.

The problem I do have, Mr G, is that it's all very well delivering a film through the eyes of a child, but the story we see still has to be dramatic. And by that, I don't expect car chases, explosions (though you deliver there, eventually) or kung-fu. But equally, I don't want to be waiting and waiting for something to happen, some kind of arc or shape to the narrative that really engages me.

There's nothing wrong with the accents, nothing really wrong with the performances. But film is about story. And I just didn't care.

I really, really wanted to like this and had great expectations.

But, I'm afraid, you were right. Some of us weren't going to like it.

Note to audience: If self-indulgence is your thing, jump right in.

  16 out of 22 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Lydia Jones from London , 31/01/2007

While at times uncomfortable viewing, Gilliam knows when to draw the line. Beautifully told in true Gilliam style; camera angles to disorientate the viewer and the brilliant juxtaposition of the open landscape of the fields with the dark claustrophobic interiors.

I loved this film and it's Terry's best by a mile - beautiful, fantastical yet awkwardly real at the same time.

  11 out of 16 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

A customer from Torpoint , 17/08/2008

First time I've ever wanted to call Social Services! I hated it, found it deeply disturbing but I couldnt stop watching it in morbid fascination. Well done Gilliam.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Emsels from Bristol , 17/08/2008

This is a great movie. It is truly wacky, weird and fun. It invokes particular feelings and emotions from the viewer and it could go anyway at any moment I had no idea how it would end. Totally what I love in films. I'm a big Gilliam fan but I wouldn't have guessed it was him (apart from a few of the camera moves) from the content.

If you want something different I highly recommend it.

Read all highest rated reviews