Features > Movie Reviews > Dear Wendy…

Dear Wendy Review

05 Aug 2005
Critics rating: 3.5 stars out of 5
Reviewed by Tom Charity , LOVEFiLM
Dear Wendy

Lars von Trier is a filmmaker who relishes the role of provocateur.

Dear Wendy is directed by his Dogme associate Thomas Vinterberg (Festen; It's All About Love) but the screenplay is prime LVT.

Set in a mining town in the mid-West, it's a film about a group of teenage losers (led by our own Jamie Bell) who form an underground pacifist gun club, the Dandies. They dress up in cavalier garb, meet in a disused mine which they dub their "temple", name and "marry" their "partners" – the guns. (Wendy herself is a snub revolver.) But while target practice is mandatory, they swear they will never brandish their weapons in anger.

A satirical allegory on America's fetishistic gun culture, Dear Wendy has moments of high style and grand, eccentric fun. Just carrying their arsenal is empowering for these formerly downtrodden kids. But when the film shifts into (inevitable) tragedy, it hinges on a ludicrous implausibility from which it never recovers. I believe the phrase is 'shooting yourself in the foot'.

Dear Wendy Reviews

loading loading...

Write your own review

LOVEFiLM Review Dear Wendy

  • 3.5 stars out of 5  

    By Tom Charity from LOVEFiLM

    Dogme filmmaker Thomas Vinterberg explores America's fetishistic gun culture...

    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)

Most helpful review Dear Wendy

  • Action with flair...

    Rated - 5.0 stars  
    By pigtiger from Suffolk , 06 Dec 2005

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    If you look at this film as a piece of art, and you just want to enjoy a damn good story without searching for metaphors or morality then you’ll be delighted. Its nicely paced, looks beautiful and the performances are very good indeed. The writer and director both claim that there’s no message about guns/America’s attitude to guns in the film, and that stands up. I can, however, also see that people will argue that there is a distinct message about violence, but I’m also certain that you could find equal amounts of people who see an anti-gun message and those who claim it glamorises firearms.

    The actions of the gang may seem extreme, but anyone who has spent even one day feeling “left-out” can identify with the fervency that the group succumb to once they finally feel that they belong with a group of like-minded individuals.

    The film doesn’t give me a chance to do one of those lazy “x meets y” reviews because I can’t think of a similar film. One can recognise aspects of Lars Von Trier’s other works in the script and certainly in the graphics, but the director has stamped his own style on the film.

    For those of you who do want one of those lazy reviews try “The Breakfast Club meets The Quick and the Dead” – now that’s got you wondering…
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (27) Yes |
    •  No (6)

All reviews

(42)
  • Guns Are For Kids - Yeah?

    Rated - 4.0 stars  
    By Cato (705 reviews) from Lydbury North , 23 Jan 2013
    This film has all the appearances of a film for adolescents, but there's a deeper satire here in that it's a reflection on the gun culture which is a large part of the American psyche,and which has very much come to the fore in recent times. It's a very well done fim and superbly acted, but was it ever going to bring about a more pacific side to America? Probably not. It certainly hasn't stopped the plethora of gun related stories in recent American films.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Rather uncomfortable

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By sailonby (108 reviews) from Exeter , 04 Jul 2011
    A stylish but ultimately uncomfortable film which says something about the fascination, and destructive power, of guns, and about the shelter afforded to the inadequate by gangs. It made me shudder somewhat.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Terrible, don't bother.

    Rated - 0.0 stars  
    By Jcat (6 reviews) from London , 16 Jun 2009
    So, the first half hour is fine, good introduction and you expect it to move on with some in-depth charactor building, but thats where the film decides it can't be bothered anymore and decends into dull, tripe. Constant narrative makes for child like over hard hitting points where it would be best to let the viewer watch the intricacies of interaction (there are none). Glorification of guns and in the end voilence.Desperate to be a modern day western, doesn't manage. I have seen reviews that claim it is forcing us to re-evaluate gun culture, this film has no such depth. Another piece of bland overindulgant time wasting with Lars Von Triers name all over it. One of the worst films I have ever seen, and I have seen thousands.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (7)
  • Dreary Windy

    Rated - 0.0 stars  
    By LarryKetang (1 review) from Manchester , 12 May 2009
    Inflated, pointless, painful nonsense!

    The worst film i've ever had the misfortune of watching.

    I rented this film at the weekend to watch with my wife... she left me half way through for a man with a VHS copy of Battlefield Earth.

    The script appears to have been written on a broken calculator by a blind recess monkey. The characters are about as deep as 'prime time' Saturday night ITV, drawing no empathy what-so-ever from their bewildwered and some-what offended audience.

    The best bit is the relief you feel when the credits eventually roll, and you begin creating a massive mental list of all the inept, time wasters involved so you never have to endure this kind of 'modern art' again.

    I suggest rubbing a bag of angry wasps on your face instead!
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (9)
  • Curiously average

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By Sean Sansom from Wrexham , 14 Jan 2009
    From the director of Festen (+ writer Lars Von Trier), I was expecting a far more engaging work. The film certainly wasn't bad and, for that matter, was fairly enjoyable, but seemed to lack the substance I expected from it (either that or I simply didn't 'get it'). All in all, certainly worth a view but don't make the mistake of expecting too much.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial

Features, Reviews & Interviews