A cut above the crud that Nic Cage has been perpetrating on a regular basis lately.
Knowing is a strenuously doomy sci-fi thriller that takes itself more seriously than something like Next, despite certain similarities in the story department.
Cage’s MIT professor John Koestler is intrigued, at first, then dismayed, when he examines the missive his son has brought home from school. It is a letter from half a century ago, when the pupils of a local school left their predictions about the world in a time capsule that has been sealed ever since. Most of the kids drew robots or spaceships, but not Lucinda – her envelope contains a series of numbers, enough to fill an entire page. The sequence 091101 stands out, especially when John realises the numbers that follow it are the same as the tally of the dead on that fateful day. As he examines the numbers more closely, he realises each equation signifies the date and death count of a serious disaster. Worse, there are three more dates at the end, all for this very week…
| Top rated films | View all |
|---|---|
| Rock, The - BLU-RAY Version (1996) | |
| Con Air - BLU-RAY Version (1997) |
Yes, it has some very big problems in the credibility department, and universally lousy acting to boot. But it also has genuinely disturbing moments. This is a dark, tense story and you couldn’t accuse the movie of pulling its punches. Sometimes you might wish that it had.
Credit director Alex Proyas, whose Dark City is a worthy cult film, but who has only made one picture since (I, Robot). Proyas has a bold visual sense and, it turns out, a taste for carnage - attributes that carry the portentous atmosphere through some clumsily written scenes. (The screenplay boasts six pairs of hands, including Proyas and Donnie Darko auteur Richard Kelly, who was once slated to direct this).
Some elements in the screenplay don’t appear to have been worked through properly or have fallen prey to budget limitations. John Koestler’s son Caleb (played by one Chandler Canterbury) has a hearing disability and picks up confusing signals from people he dubs the whisperers, but they never tell him anything useful and the kid never does anything. Come the movie’s last reel revelations you have to wonder if there wasn’t a simpler way to engineer the same outcome.
Not does it help that Proyas shoots the whisperers like an 80s New Romantic band, all long coats, severe blond haircuts and backlighting… I kept thinking of Ultravox: "Ah, Vienna!"
Knowing: Nicolas Cage
A subplot – on the backburner, as it were – about an imminent series of sun-flares which are supposedly the cause of an unseasonal heat wave would work better if Proyas gave us an indication that things are actually hotting up. He might have asked Nic Cage to unbutton his shirt or something…
But it’s easy to see where the money was spent. The movie has three big CGI sequences. Each depicts a different disaster in spectacular fashion. Spectacular, but also grisly and horrific. Remember when, after 9/11, pundits suggested the Hollywood disaster movie was over? Quite the opposite: the effect seems to have been to encourage ever more graphic and realistic scenes of devastation and despair, to the point where Knowing could be considered traumatic to watch.
But it’s easy to see where the money was spent. The movie has three big CGI sequences. Each depicts a different disaster in spectacular fashion. Spectacular, but also grisly and horrific. Remember when, after 9/11, pundits suggested the Hollywood disaster movie was over? Quite the opposite: the effect seems to have been to encourage ever more graphic and realistic scenes of devastation and despair, to the point where Knowing could be considered traumatic to watch.
The bombastic, earth-shudderingly loud score offers no relief, though the cosmic ending might invite a few chortles.
Even so, despite its many faults, Knowing is sometimes unsettlingly good. My advice: bring ear plugs and hope for the best.
loading...
Alex Proyass derivative sci-fi movie is a close encounter of the nerd kind, mixing Spielbergian child-like wonder,... read more on Time Out
dont bother wish i hadn't!! average action, poor weak story line which doesnt flow! ending is riddiculous!!
To give this film the benefit of the doubt, I should point out that there are one or two very impressive disaster scenes, where planes and trains go crashing monumentally towards the camera, ploughing through crowds of commuters as they go. The only problem is that Nicolas Cage is there saving the day, instead of being torn apart in the crush.
This is the kind of big-budget Hollywood Thriller that, if at all, should only been seen at the Cinema, and with your eyes closed - that way you get to experience the decent soundtrack and the huge explosions, without having to endure Cage's excrutiating (for him, seemingly, as well as for the audience) pained facial expressions with which he tries to compensate for the fact he simply has never learnt to act.
The plot line itself is reasonably gripping but it's also very silly in parts and the good bits aren't nearly good enough to make up for all the hollow sci-fi nonsense. Seriously - don't waste your time with this film.
dont bother wish i hadn't!! average action, poor weak story line which doesnt flow! ending is riddiculous!!
dont bother wish i hadn't!! average action, poor weak story line which doesnt flow! ending is riddiculous!!
YET ANOTHER MOVIE FROM 'THE END IS NIGH' GENRE. WELL ACTED AND A SURPRISINGLY ORIGINAL AND ENTERTAINING PLOT, GOOD ACTING AND GREAT ACTION SCENES (AS YOU WOULD EXPECT FROM A CAGE FILM). SLIGHTLY PREDICTABLE ENDING BUT THIS DID NOT DETRACT FROM AN ALL ROUND QUALITY PRODUCTION.
I went into this movie expecting a moderately entertaining Nic Cage thriller like Next.
Turns out I wasn't too far off, but this has more, much more.
Firstly (but kind of least importantly) the effects are GREAT. There are a few scenes (you'll know when you see them) that really make you open your eyes. Very realistic without being massively over the top, though there are some blockbuster moments... and unexpectedly graphic.
The acting is good on all accounts, even the children for the most part,which I find rare to come across nowadays.
Now the storyline is what grabbed me. It has a bit of a Happening or Signs-esque ending which some really won't get on with, but the scariest part is that the plot is arguably possible on some levels if you follow the theories of certain scientists. Many non-believers will slate the movie, but if you take time to understand the theories and calculations, it does make a lot of sense.
There are only a few scenes that I think could have been made differently to gain more credibility, but other than that I was very 'taken' with this film (pun intended).
Verdict: 5 stars
I hope all enjoy Knowing as much as I did!
It started off promising, was good in the middle and the end just let it down.
I was desperate to go and see the film and the trailer looked great. I came away disappointed.
Up until the last 15 minutes I was definitely going to buy this film. It was brilliant. And then it all went rapidly downhill. Its almost as if someone who hadn't seen the film wrote the end. TERRIBLE! If you can live with that, give it a watch.
Alex Proyass derivative sci-fi movie is a close encounter of the nerd kind, mixing Spielbergian child-like wonder,... read more on Time Out