Revolutionary Road

26 Jan 2009
Critics rating: 4 stars out of 5
Reviewed by Tom Charity, LOVEFiLM

Ever felt that you're wasting the best years of your life in drudgery? That your marriage has gone as stale as your all but forgotten youthful hopes and dreams?

That things would be so much better if you walked out on your job and took off for a new start in… let’s say, Paris?

Well if you haven’t, just wait, my child. At any rate, that’s how Frank and April Wheeler are feeling circa 1956. He commutes from their handsome suburban Connecticut home on Revolutionary Road, working for the same firm his dad did, not out of love or loyalty but just because it was the course that fell to him. She’s a mom, a housewife, and definitely not the actress she thought she might have been. A stab at am-dram in the film’s breathtakingly incisive second scene conclusively shuts off that escape route. (The lightning speed with which their romance hits the rocks is director Sam Mendes’s most inspired cinematic touch.)

Cast details

April knows they’re better than this and she wants Frank to know it too. If he doesn’t there’s surely no hope for their marriage. And the thing is, he wants to believe it. He can coast through his work day, dip into the secretary pool as he fancies, but in the immortal words of Peggy Lee, Leiber and Stoller: is that all there is?

Mendes tapped into this disillusionment before in the Oscar-winning American Beauty. Revolutionary Road is a more somber affair, though April’s plan to sell up and get a job in la belle France while Frank “finds himself” is arguably as deluded as Kevin Spacey’s belated decision to drop out in the earlier film. Certainly that’s how their non-plussed friends and neighbours see it.

Revolutionary Road: Leonardo DiCaprio, Kate Winslet

Based on a well-regarded (as opposed to widely read) 1961 novel by Richard Yates, the film is a domestic melodrama with an element of suspense. Will they get to Paris? Played by Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio (reunited a decade after Titanic) they make an attractive couple, so we’re pulling for them. But if one of them talks about backing down, is that a betrayal, or just a return to common sense?

Everything in this movie is shrewd and well done. As a filmmaker Mendes always seems in control of every aspect of his material – to a fault, sometimes, in over-designed films like Road to Perdition. Here the acting is raw and abrasive enough to cut through the comfortable suburban surface – Winslet is magnificent as the obviously intelligent but directionless April, and DiCaprio suggests how easily a certain kind of man can be seduced by the road of least resistance.

As the movie goes on, the limitations of this ostensibly golden couple become harder to ignore. Their banality is thrown into sharp relief by two outstanding scenes with Michael Shannon (from Bug) as the mentally troubled son of the Wheeler’s friend and realtor (played by Kathy Bates). She brings him over for tea because they’re the closest thing to intellectuals she knows, and her boy John was an academic before his breakdown. She hopes some of the Wheelers’ apparent prosperity and grace will rub off on him.

Overwhelmingly, this is a tough, unhappy tale, a feel bad movie told with vigor and expertise.

Instead, they announce their plan to up sticks for France and John can’t contain his delight at this wholesale rejection of the American way. “Hopeless emptiness!” he echoes, when Frank explains their thinking. “Now you’ve said it! Plenty of people are on to the emptiness. But it takes real guts to see the hopelessness!”

Shannon’s unsettling performance is so hard-edged, abrasive and funny, it threatens to skewer the whole show right there and then. Indeed, the film’s actual climax feels phony and contrived in comparison with the crisis this bone fide non-conformist precipitates in the Wheeler home.

Overwhelmingly, this is a tough, unhappy tale, a feel bad movie told with vigor and expertise. It must be said, it’s a story we’ve heard before, many times. The themes still resonate, I think (see also: Little Children) but the 1950s setting does factor… You wonder if April couldn’t have got a job in the city and found a decent nursery? Even so, I’m surprised, and disappointed, that the film should have been rejected so dramatically in last week’s Oscar nominations. (It received three, but only one – for Shannon – in the big six categories.)

Reviews

loading loading...

  • Critics' reviews of Revolutionary Road

    View all
  • 3 stars out of

    Kate! Leo! Sam Mendes! And a Great American Novel! The stars are aligned! All known film industry computations dictate... read more on Time Out

    • Dave Calhoun, 
    • Time Out
  • Most helpful members' reviews (3) of Revolutionary Road

    View all
  • 112 out of 114 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 2 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Solid enough but lacking any real bite or originality

    The latest film from Sam Mendes the acclaimed theatre director turned Hollywood darling by his first feature, American Beauty. He quickly followed this up with the Road to Perdition, Jarhead and now Revolution Road, adapted from the cult Richard Yates novel.

    The film returns to the themes first covered by Mendes in American Beauty of mundane, bored and unfulfilled relationships behind the white middle class picket fences of suburban American. Unfortunately, this all sounds very familiar and when the film is running it does feel very outdated and dull. After watching David Lynch’s dark masterpiece Blue Velvet and even Mendes own American Beauty it’s easy to feel this is a soft touch lacking any real bite, satirical edge or originality.

    On the plus side, the performances are solid, if a little too worthy, the cinematography is neat and unfussy and the supporting roles are good, even if they are very clichéd.

      • Daniel Pollard from Manchester, England
  • 39 out of 44 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Made for awards not for entertainment

    Fooled by the critics again, we expected this to be a tour de force film that was different than any other, instead we were rewarded by two hours of a chain smoking 50's couple falling out, making up, falling out, shouting at each other and general un-entertaining misery that might be high brow enough in its acting performances to have the various awards bodies clamouring to dish out the gongs, for us mere mortals who want a bit of escapist entertainment if you slept for an hour of this you will have missed 2 minutes, a pretty miserable film that we could not recommended.

      • A customer from Ashton-Under-Lyne
  • 38 out of 46 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Depressing and boring

    Very disappointing. I really couldn't get into this film, it had nothing remarkable about it at all. The acting was good, but the storyline was weak with no decent scenery. I would have very happily walked out of the cinema. It wasn't even realistic, the kids only appeared a couple or three times.

    I guess it was trying to put a point across, but by the end of the film I really couldn't care what happened to either of the lead characters.

      • A customer from Petworth
  • Most recent members' reviews (2) of Revolutionary Road

    View all
  • 1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    The Reader

    Boring, Boring, Boring!!! Thought it would be realy good but Kate Winslet is just so in love with herself it's painful!

      • A customer from East Sussex
  • 1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Not sure about this one

    Not sure about this movie. I was really looking forward to it and watched it to the end but can't say I enjoyed it..but am pleased I watched it. Make up your own mind I guess.

      • A customer from Esher
  • 112 out of 114 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 2 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Solid enough but lacking any real bite or originality

    The latest film from Sam Mendes the acclaimed theatre director turned Hollywood darling by his first feature, American Beauty. He quickly followed this up with the Road to Perdition, Jarhead and now Revolution Road, adapted from the cult Richard Yates novel.

    The film returns to the themes first covered by Mendes in American Beauty of mundane, bored and unfulfilled relationships behind the white middle class picket fences of suburban American. Unfortunately, this all sounds very familiar and when the film is running it does feel very outdated and dull. After watching David Lynch’s dark masterpiece Blue Velvet and even Mendes own American Beauty it’s easy to feel this is a soft touch lacking any real bite, satirical edge or originality.

    On the plus side, the performances are solid, if a little too worthy, the cinematography is neat and unfussy and the supporting roles are good, even if they are very clichéd.

      • Daniel Pollard from Manchester, England
  • 39 out of 44 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Made for awards not for entertainment

    Fooled by the critics again, we expected this to be a tour de force film that was different than any other, instead we were rewarded by two hours of a chain smoking 50's couple falling out, making up, falling out, shouting at each other and general un-entertaining misery that might be high brow enough in its acting performances to have the various awards bodies clamouring to dish out the gongs, for us mere mortals who want a bit of escapist entertainment if you slept for an hour of this you will have missed 2 minutes, a pretty miserable film that we could not recommended.

      • A customer from Ashton-Under-Lyne
  • 38 out of 46 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Depressing and boring

    Very disappointing. I really couldn't get into this film, it had nothing remarkable about it at all. The acting was good, but the storyline was weak with no decent scenery. I would have very happily walked out of the cinema. It wasn't even realistic, the kids only appeared a couple or three times.

    I guess it was trying to put a point across, but by the end of the film I really couldn't care what happened to either of the lead characters.

      • A customer from Petworth
  • 19 out of 22 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star [Highly rated reviewer]

    Mundane Medis!

    Well, nothing is more depressing than watching a film about a couple that do nothing but argue and basically that is it . the acting is good but the story is dull dull dull - a waste of an hour and 52 mins of your life!

  • 18 out of 19 people found this review helpful

    * * * This review contains spoilers * * *ShowHide

    Rated - 4 stars

    realisation that there must be more to life

      • A customer from London
  • 18 out of 20 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Worse than Boring...

    After an hour of a couple that you just can't care about, we walked out of the cinema.

    Winslet and Dicaprio are unbelievable as a 50s suburban American couple, and frankly the characters weren't developed enough. This happens to be one of those films that should have stayed a book.

    Made for awards rather than entertainment, this is a project that would have worked better in Arthouses, not in chain cinemas.

    Avoid.

      • A customer from Reading
  • 18 out of 21 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    This film is Amaz......

    ..................ingly CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Dull in the extreme

  • 13 out of 14 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Not a feel good film

    If you are looking for a light hearted film do not make this your choice. There was not one scene that made me feel happy - very depressing indeed.

      • Gemma Woodhams from Basingstoke, Hampshire
  • 12 out of 13 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars

    Superb!

    Reminiscent of American Beauty. Stunning performances. A must see!

      • dmf from London
  • 11 out of 12 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    just not believeable

    I read the book before i saw the film and the book was terrible but somehow i felt that the film could deliver more...but it didnt.

    The storyline is quite minimal however there is the scope for it to be incredibly moving but the beginning of the film is too rushed, you dont get behind the characters because the section where you see them meeting at the party is too short and the chemistry isnt there. I found myself sitting through the rest of the film thinking that if i believed that the couple adored each other then it would be a heart wrenching film....but you dont feel for them as a couple and therefore you dont care that their relationship breaks down.

      • A customer from York
  • Critics' reviews

  • 3 stars out of

    Kate! Leo! Sam Mendes! And a Great American Novel! The stars are aligned! All known film industry computations dictate... read more on Time Out

    • Dave Calhoun, 
    • Time Out

* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.