Features > Movie Reviews > The Informant!…

The Informant! Review

16 Nov 2009
Critics rating: 4.5 stars out of 5
Reviewed by Tom Charity , LOVEFiLM
The Informant!

Good or bad, movies about whistleblowers tend to hit you over the head with their self-importance...

(Among the good, I think you would have to list The Insider, Michael Clayton, and Steven Soderbergh?s Erin Brockovich).

Soderbergh?s latest almost goes to the opposite exteme. It’s insistent on its own absurdity.

It’s a risky strategy that may have cost the film the kind of respect it deserves in the US – and Matt Damon an Oscar nomination. Audiences like to know who they’re rooting for, but for the longest time, we’re never quite sure what makes Damon?s character, Mark Whitacre, tick, even though a stream of consciousness voice-over narration puts us inside his head for most of the film’s two hour running time. As a result, The Informant! is delightfully unpredictable or irritatingly unsatisfying, depending on how you look at it.

Cast details

That also sets a problem for a reviewer, because it would be a pity to undermine the film’s surprises. Here’s what you can and should know: it is based on a true story. Whitacre was a bio-chemist at a powerful US agri-business, ADM, for a number of years, eventually working his way up to the top tiers of management.

In an unheard of eventuality, the high-flyer turns whistle-blower. At first he claims that a Japanese competitor is attempting blackmail. But when the FBI comes to investigate, he stuns the agent (Scott Bakula) by revealing his own firm is involved in an international price-fixing scam. The Feds require evidence, and soon Mark is assisting them, amassing hundreds of hours of audio and video recordings. In the process, he begins to think of himself as a James Bond – or Jason Bourne – super-spy. His ego, and his judgment, prove completely out of control.

In a typically bold move, Soderbergh opts to shoot this in the elegantly composed style of a 1970s conspiracy thriller – say, All the President?s Men. It doesn’t look or feel like the 1990s, the orangey glow of the lighting suggests a slightly faded old movie, but then again, ADM was based in Illinois, and middle America is not New York (in point of fact Soderbergh shot in the Whitacres’ actual mansion).

Matt Damon

In a seemingly paradoxical stylistic choice, the director has veteran composer Marvin Hamlisch (The Sting; A Chorus Line) punctuate the action with a disarmingly jaunty, upbeat score – the kind of theme music Whitacre might have playing inside his own earnest but bewildering head.

Funny in a knowing, bitterly ironic fashion, The Informant! suggests the infinite corruption that we know is eating away at the heart of big business must also have wormed its way into the good old American hero.

Damon is still something of a boy scout

Pudgy, with a ridiculously square moustache and hairpiece, a self-consciously stiff-backed walk, Damon is still something of a boy scout, and you have to respect Mark’s courage and peculiar integrity. Very peculiar, as it turns out – but that’s for you to see for yourself. This movie pays us the considerable compliment of leaving us to take our own moral bearing – something that Mark Whitacre, caught up in his own Hollywood fantasies, seems to have been completely incapable of.

The Informant! Reviews

loading loading...

Write your own review

LOVEFiLM Review Informant!, The

  • 4.5 stars out of 5  

    By Tom Charity from LOVEFiLM

    Matt Damon and director Steven Soderbergh reunite for this comedy gem...

    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)

Most helpful review Informant!, The

  • Disappointing

    Rated - 2.0 stars  
    By KJDA (1 review) from Bristol , 24 Nov 2009

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    Usually I'm the first in line for a film that is quirky or unusual and more often than not loving it when most others just can't see the point. The Informant! however was the first exception for some time - dull and disappointing about sums it up for me I'm afraid.

    It was filmed as though set in the 70's that did not fit with the setting of the story which was the 90's through to the current decade. I've read in another review that that is okay because it does take place in Illinois and not in the more sophisticated Eastern States. Not keen on that statement having lived there myself in the 90's, it might not be New York but the Mid-West does not live in a different era!

    There were some mildly amusing scenes in the film, the narration by Whitacre, who is the informer, over much of the film was a clever way to 'hear' his thoughts. Over all I would not recommend this one as a must see.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (66) Yes |
    •  No (16)

All reviews

(152)
  • The Informant - based on a true story

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By MelissaMarabamma (218 reviews) from South Coast UK , 02 Mar 2013
    Plot twists that you do not see coming until well into the story. Incredible that it is a true story at it's core. Very entertaining.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • If you REALLY have nothing better to do

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By a customer , 13 Jan 2013

    THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS Show review anywayHide

    Its Ok, The twist is not convincing, actually almost disappointing. Moves at a reasonable speed, and manages to keep at least 70% of your interest
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (1)
  • Sleepy Damon

    Rated - 1.5 stars  
    By Andyyy41 (3 reviews) , 09 Jan 2013

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    Very rarely will I turn a film off half way through, and even more so a film featuring Matt Damon. This film was completely disappointing and misleading. The one good thing about this film are the reviews. Give them a read, you'll stay awake longer.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (1) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Good but needs perseverance

    Rated - 3.5 stars  
    By blueskies22 (6 reviews) , 04 Jan 2013

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    As a previous reviewer mentioned, this film has been given some unduly bad write ups. I takes a bit of perseverance - perhaps a bit slow to get off the mark - but it IS a very good story. Soderberg does a decent job of tying it all together and the cast likewise. If you enjoyed Matt Damon in the Talented Mr Ripley then you'll probably find this film similarly enjoyable. If I have to level any criticisms at the flick they are as follows: firstly, reproducing the cinematography as well as the props of the early to mid-90s (the period over which most of the film occurs) is unnecessary. The scenery and furnishings of the offices and home were probably spot on but a bit more zing in the camera work would have helped. And whilst I'm here I may as well lambast those awful purple Austin-Powers style titles that were periodically superimposed on the screen! Overall rated good with the potential to be very good but probably never brilliant. Worth watching.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (1) Yes |
    •  No (1)
  • Worthy shot, interesting, quirky, ultimately unsatisfying

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By j9ball (1 review) , 04 Dec 2012

    THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS Show review anywayHide

    Quite a strange little film really. One can imagine it might have sounded more wonderful as a concept than it came out on film: the true life adventure of an essentially slimy and irresponsible yet strangely likable liar. The 70s motif is an odd choice, since the action is all 90s and above, but adds to the general quirky aesthetic. The performances are uniformly brilliant. Damon is great. Scott Bakula is wonderful. Everyone's got it down, the peculiar sense of innocence mixed with corruption and ridiculousness. I nearly turned it off several times, but I'm glad I saw it through to the end, because just when you think you've got the picture, it gets substantially weirder over the last 20 minutes. I'd say ultimately it's not a must-see by any stretch, but it's kind of an amusing and interesting failure -- or perhaps failure is too harsh, but there's a sense that it doesn't quite reach the absurdist heights to which it aspires. Just not entirely satisfying somehow.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial

Features, Reviews & Interviews