The BBFC is now classifying films with an eye for discrimination and prejudice, as well as the long-established parameters of sex and violence.
The news is both intriguing and welcome, on one level, perplexing and worrying on another.
The new rules seem designed to look at a broader social picture, taking in the context and import behind cinematic representations, rather than just focusing on skin and blood. That seems sensible. But of course prejudice and discrimination is often in the eye of the beholder, and the BBFC may be opening the door to – on the one hand – the PC police, and on the other, endless tabloid barracking.
The first three titles for which certificates have been revised upwards all represent soft targets: Date Movie, Epic Movie and Norbit were rated 12 or 12A and now are classified 15. It’s hard to imagine anyone defending these universally reviled comedies, though I think you could make a case that throwaway comedies shouldn’t be taken too seriously.
| Top rated films | View all |
|---|---|
| Transformers - BLU-RAY Version (2007) |
| Top rated films | View all |
|---|---|
| Transformers - BLU-RAY Version (2007) |
But what about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen? Rated 12A by the BBFC. Is the 12A classification already a bit harsh (my ten year old wants to watch it) or it too lenient?
The story, such as it is, involves evil robots the Decepticons coming back to Earth to destroy Optimus Prime, their old adversary Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) and the planet itself.
It’s questionable just what age-range the movie is shooting for. On the one hand, this is a film based on a line of toys intended for the pre-teens and it’s produced by US manufacturer Hasbro. On the other, the brand was a favourite with kids back in the 80s, so the boys who grew up with them then are now in their late 20s, early 30s, and potentially feeling nostalgic.
If we look to the movie itself for clues, the character of Sam is just entering college, so presumably he is 18 or 19 (La Beouf just turned 23). His girlfriend Mikaela (Megan Fox) isn’t going to college – she’s working in her ex con father’s garage as a mechanic – but she’s the same age (so is Fox).
Does the fact that he’s middle class and brainy and she’s working class and not cerebral mean the movie is sexist? Or does the fact that she is good with motors while he’s a bit of a nerd signal the reverse?
Transformers 2 - Revenge of the Fallen: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel,
Maybe it’s more telling to look at the way director Michael Bay shoots Fox – a model who doesn’t resemble any mechanic I’ve met. She’s first seen from behind, half-prone on top of a motorbike, her derriere stuck up in the air like a Playboy bunny. That proves typical of her appearances in the movie: she’s constantly posed in a sexually suggestive manner, even when she’s running away from missiles and giant robots (invariably in slow motion).
It’s true that she does save Sam from one Decepticon, but this creature – disguised as a fellow student who seduces/near-rapes him – is hardly a compelling argument against charges of sexism. Nor is the character of Sam’s mum, who is repeatedly shown to be over-emotional, irrational, hysterical, embarrassing, or a combination of all four.
Sexism isn’t a crime – not yet – but do we want our 12 year olds sucking down these kind of stereotypes?
And what about race? Much of the movie takes place in the Middle East, in Egypt and Jordan – in fact Bay destroys several ancient landmarks, including one of the Seven Wonders of the World. Yet as far as I recall, there is only speaking part in the movie for an Arabic character, a checkpoint army officer who is initially presented as a potential menace, and then (when his diminutive stature becomes clear) as a figure of fun, easily distracted from his duty because of his love for New York, of all things.
There is a rather odd reference by one of the US military personnel to imminent rescue by “the Jordanians”, here recast as the Seventh Cavalry, which I assume reflects the filmmakers’ gratitude towards the hospitality of the Jordanian authorities and military during the shooting (though the Jordanian helicopter referred to is promptly shot down by a Decepticon).
More troubling than the film’s implicit sexism and xenophobia, for me anyway, is Michael Bay’s on-going love affair with the US military. Granted the army’s high tech surveillance and weaponry are outgunned for long stretches of this film by the alien invaders, but all the same, Bay shoots the servicemen like they were GQ models, backlit, in slow motion, striding manfully and with purpose. In contrast, we’re told that President Obama has gone into hiding at the first sign of trouble, and his administration’s state department head immediately shuts down the only unit that might actually help in these circumstances, a secret joint US-Autobot outfit.
It is only by illegally countervening these government orders – and later, ordering an unauthorised missile strike on the Great Pyramid at Giza – that army personnel avert disaster.
In other words, democratic institutions won’t save the planet, we need to put our faith in the US military’s pre-emptive strike capability. That might sound like a lot to read into a mere movie, but bear in mind this was the central argument in John McCain’s Presidential campaign last year. “Revenge of the Fallen” indeed.
I don’t know if any of this makes the new Transformers any more suitable for 15 year olds than 12 year olds. But I do know that this overblown, overlong, and unforgivably boring blockbuster must be the longest toy commercial ever made – and my kids won’t be seeing it any time soon.
loading...
With this cash-cow sequel to his widely derided, hugely succesful original, Michael Bay comes closer than any director... read more on Time Out
cant wait for this....awesome 1st one was very well done
Who the hell decided it was a good idea to put college humour in a Transformer movie?! I'd like to know so I can hit them with a stick. I mean the first movie had a couple of naff jokes in it, but this is absolutely laced with it. A lot of sexual references, a couple of distasteful 'comedy' moments, too much swearing for the type of film and loads of naff ideas like transformers that fart, a transformer with balls (I kid you not) and a little one that humps the girls leg - I mean c'mon! Who thought up this crap?! I don't wanna say too much, but if you don't like that sort of humour, then you're gonna be disappointed too. Most of the time I did absolutely love this film, but there were quite a few times when I didn't like it at all - never have I had such extremely mixed feelings as I did with this movie. The first film is definitely better and although still not perfect was nowhere near as flawed as this - and I'm no sequel hater. If I love a movie I'm over the moon when they make a sequel as most of the time I love them too. Thankfully the action is superb again and delivers even more than the first film, with much improved camera work so you can tell what's happening much easier and see all the awesome killer attacks in all their glory. And as you'd expect, the movie is chock full of explosive action and robot punch-ups. On it's own, the action is an easy 5 stars. Unfortunately, the comedy hugely lets the film down. If I'd had my way, the first half would have been heavily edited, with almost every scene with the actors in removed. I just kept sitting there thinking 'oh shut the hell up and get back to the action!' It wasn't the cast themselves though, I'm a big fan of Shia - I think he's a fantastic actor and he really throws himself into every scenario. I thought he was great in the first film so I was glad to see him return and of course seeing the sizzlingly hot Megan Fox again was not a bad thing at all. It was their material I didn't like. If I'm totally honest, I'm a bit of a prude and I like my humour mostly clean. But really, I wouldn't have minded the jokes if they had been in the right film. Just not Transformers - it's so out of place it's cringeworthy at times. It's like watching a film that's trying to be a more serious action adventure and switches (or should I say transforms?) to a Transformers college spoof. It's an odd combination that for me, didn't work. I'm not saying a comedy side to this film is a no-no, but had it been done like the Mummy films with family-friendly humour, it would have been much better. In my not so humble opinion. At times, the film feels like it's been made by geniuses with stellar special effects, fantastically choreographed fightscenes and tons of fresh and inventive ideas for the transformers universe. The amount of commitment and passion that's gone into making this is very evident onscreen. But then it also feels like it's been made by idiots with a fairly naff story (not something that usually bothers me, but it is). There are so many directions they could've taken the plot, but instead they went with something quite unadventurous, quite basic and at times quite odd. Not the greatest writing by any means. In all fairness though, this isn't a big issue and could have been ignored had it been the film's only downfall. The script was at times the same unfortunately with some pretty bad lines and amateur writing. And then there's the dumbass humour - that was the worst. Yes I know, I sound like an old whingebag. I really tried to like the film more - I kept telling myself to just stop thinking and enjoy it. But I just could'nt. I couldn't ignore the films flaws. And much as I loved the first movie, I can't help but start to wish someone else had made the Transformers movies. The franchise's true potential just isn't being realised and with this latest effort it's obvious they are taking it in the wrong direction. At the end of day, I still came out of the cinema having thoroughly enjoyed a brilliant thrillride movie with awesome action. And if you like the film's sense of humour, which a lot of people will, then there's really nothing to complain about. Whether it's all to my liking or not, I would never say this is a bad film. It still has a lot to offer, it's pure escapism entertainment and is a genuinely excellent movie at times. Overall, I'd still give it an impressive 4 stars though I reckon G.I. Joe could be the best blockbuster of the summer. Fingers crossed.
After reading some of the reviews on here i feel that some people are being a bit harsh. Ok there are a couple of hours that you could probably do without in the film, maybe a couple of robots that you could also do without, but i think you need to remember it is a family film and not designed for true Roboteers who will be offended if it does not match up to the exact detail of their beloved comics.
Whilst watching i have to admit, half way in i was thinking where is this going, whats with all the cheesey toilet humour and whats with these dumbass robots Tweedle dum and Tweedle dee? But a lot of it did have the whole screen laughing out loud and clearly had the desired effect. After i had got over the cheese i sat back and just took in the spectacle that is Transformers 2. You will never see another film quite like it, you can only sit in awe of the CGI and special effects.. All in all i came out of the cinema not feeling like i had sat through 2.5 hours of hell and instead thinking that the good bits out weighed the bad. Make up your own minds a must see..
cant wait for this....awesome 1st one was very well done
Transformers was always going to split the viewers opinion, it is loved and loathed in equel measure. The critics who hated it, complained that it was based on a toy, and had underwritten characters, and a paper thin plot!
All I can say to them critics is well observed, but they are seriously missing the point. Transformers knows it's limitations and never tries to be anything other than a summer popcorn blockbuster, and this is what makes the films work, as they are briliant eye scorching entertainment. Master of destruction Director Michael Bay makes this sequel bigger, alot bigger, bigger budget, bigger and better effects, More fighting robots, grand scale set pieces, longer running time, hell even the title is bigger. It's as if he has said ' lets do a sequel but make it BIGGER!' the plot is again not the main feature in the film, but serves to tie in the action.It's all about spectacle and this movie delivers, the action and effects are jaw dropping, so you must see it on the biggest screen possible, all the original characters are back, as Shia LaBeouf and the stunning Megan Fox try to have a long range relationship, until the evil Deceptorcons come calling. Also the film is just as funny as the first, as Shia's on screen parents steel every scene, the best bit is his mother getting stoned. The film does have a few minor niggles, as the plot although slim in the first place is a mess, and just like the first film, the movie is thirty minutes too long, but whan the sheer scale of the action kicks in, it's easy to forget these minor quibbles.Michael Bay proves yet again, although he is loathed by most snoppy serious critics, he knows exactly what the vast majority of the audience wants to see. In a world that is tearing it's self apart, with stories of the economic crisis, corrupt politions,and the on going war in Afghanistan, Transformers 2 is the perfect movie to forget all the worries of the world. Just go in, switch your brain off, and lap up every eye scorching silly moment. Just remember to pick your jaw off the cinema floor when you leave!
I love Transformers, and i quite like the first film, i'd give it 4 stars.
I hate to be a killjoy but this new film is pretty poor. Prime and bee are barely in it and there is little to compare to their respective fights against Bonecrusher and Barricade in the first film. Although Prime does take on multiple cons in a cool brawl.
Instead of Optimus and Bumble Bee are twin wise-crackin, buck-tooth, jar jar binks bots who transform into an icecream van true!
More weird American Pie Humour from Sheas mum as well, if you thought her Sams special alone time routine was out of place in the first film wait till you see her on a college campus!
Having said all that there is plenty of Megan Fox Baywatch running and what other film has giant robo-trucks from your childhood slapping each other around?
Knowing what i know now, id still see it. Because im an idiot.
IT SOUNDS EVEN BETTER THAN THE FIRST ONE WE WILL HAVE TO WAIT C'MON BRING IT ON
I am taking the day off specifically to go see this film!!
i hope this film will be good
judging from the adds i think it will be
Far too long, no depth or structure, was confused as to what was happening half the time, visually amazing (obviously its bay) the film itself just seemed so poorly put together maybe its just me but it just lacked any meaning, this film also really takes the p*** out of megan fox's acting skills poor just poor. no wonder bay has announced its his last.
With this cash-cow sequel to his widely derided, hugely succesful original, Michael Bay comes closer than any director... read more on Time Out
* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.