Skip over navigation

Help

King Arthur on DVD (2004)

King Arthur cover art
Average rating: 61%
1317620101014
3.0
from 5,878 members
 
Starring: Clive Owen, Ioan Gruffudd, Keira Knightley, Ray Winstone
Director: Antoine Fuqua
Studio: WALT DISNEY STUDIOS HOME ENTERTAINMENT
Run time: 126 mins
Certificate: 15
Collections: 100 Big Adventures
User collections: Damning Klio, Films You Must Die Before You See, My DVD Collection, my 100 random dvds must see, over and over agains, Public Safety Announcement: Cinematic Torture, All of my favourites!, Myths and Legends - films for the pagans amongst us.
Genres: Action/Adventure, Audio Descriptive, Thriller
Languages: English, English Audio Description
Hearing-impaired: English
Released: 29/11/2004
Also Available on:  Also Available on: BLU-RAY

Brief synopsis of King Arthur

Combining the historical appeal and epic sequences of films like GLADIATOR and BRAVEHEART, director Antoine Fuqua (TRAINING DAY) and producer Jerry Bruckheimer provide a sleek twist on the King Arthur legend. Arthur (Clive Owen), a brave Roman/British Christian warrior who leads his band of pagan knights on missions for the Empire, must complete one final mission before the knights can earn their freedom from servitude and Arthur can return to Rome. Along the way, however, Arthur realizes that the pullout of the Romans will open the door for a crushing invasion of Britain by the Saxons, and he takes it upon himself to fight with Merlin (Stephen Dillane) and Guinevere (Keira Knightley) for the freedom of the British people. Stunning battle scenes with extensive attention to historical detail rely very little on computer graphics and instead use intricately realistic props, costumes, and scenery. Featuring the largest film set ever built in Ireland, KING ARTHUR features a scale replica of Hadrian's Wall and two complete villages. Haunting music by composer Hans Zimmer completes this story of unselfish heroism, which ultimately provides a satisfying completion to the legend of Arthur and his knights.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 3 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Less a “re-imagining” of the Arthurian legend and more a Dark Ages-set remake of The Magnificent Seven, this Jerry Bruckheimer production still manages to be an occasionally exciting adventure with convincingly staged battle scenes. Most of the traditional elements are missing — there's no wizardry, no Camelot and no love triangle — so instead we get Arthur (a subdued Clive Owen) recast as a soldier with British lineage serving in the Roman army, and Guinevere (Keira Knightley) as a woad-wearing warrior. With the mystical nature of the original myth dismissed, what remains is a mud-splattered western-style standoff, with Arthur and his six loyal knights posted to Hadrian's Wall to repel a Saxon invasion. The knights all look the part — particularly Ray Winstone, who almost steals the film as the hard-fighting father of numerous illegitimate children — but the would-be rousing speeches and obligatory love scene fall flat.

Halliwell's Film Guide

A deconstruction of the usual Arthurian legends, putting in their place a darker story of betrayal in a savage Britain.

News Of The World

Just about the best battle scenes ever

See all 3 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 4 starsDon't Expect A Fantasy Film

Paul Smith from Staffordshire , 22/09/2004

Based on the other reviews, people seem to have gone into the cinema to see King Arthur expecting a completely different film. We know from the start that there will be no mystical elements but the other reviewers criticisms are based largely on that fact, that there are no mystical elements. If you want King Arthur and magic rent Excalibur but King Arthur is a better movie.

As far as history is concerned it is as accurate as we can expect. All the main people are involved Romans, Picts, Saxons, but let?s face it, no one alive today was alive back then so we just don?t know how close the film comes to reality.

This is a good film but anyone who has read La Morte D?Arthur and wants to see a movie based on the book needn?t look here. Anyone who has read any historical theses and knows about the Saxon invasion led by Cerdic and Cynric should rent this. Some elements of the historical theory of events have been missed out but this is, after all, a movie not a documentary.

Just free your mind of everything you know about the King Arthur legend and view this as a historical film.

Lastly don?t criticise this movie for being unrealistic and inaccurate without reading a book on the subject first.

  93 out of 131 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsUtter rubbish.

trotsuk from LONDON , 07/02/2005

Honestly, this film really can just f**k off. I feel like trying to sue the filmmakers for the two hours of my life they stole.

Clive Owen, I want to like you, The Croupier was great, and you rocked as the driver in the short BMW films, but your performance in this load of old crap really highlights your inability to act. How you've just been oscar nominated for Closer is beyond me. Go get some lessons, or go be James Bond where no acting skill is necessary...

  40 out of 54 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsDark Ages brought to life

LeoM from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 02/08/2005

The atmosphere and haunting landscapes of King Arthur are reason alone to watch this film. The uncertainty and fear of an anarchic post Roman Britain is excellently recreated. Haunting mist filled valleys and snow covered hills gives us an air of mysticism and a spooky otherworldly feel. Think Braveheart meets Lord of the Rings. Acting not great and plot a little weak but never mind...bloodcurdling Saxons, battled-hardened Sarmatian Knights and Pictish warriors provide plenty of axe-wielding action. Two hours well spent.

  31 out of 37 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsNever watch this movie.

Cubu Ashiru from Jamaica , 27/09/2005

This movie will make you want to punch Clive Owen repeatedly in the head while screaming 'STOP ACTING COMPLETELY RUBBISHLY, CLIVE!!'

  28 out of 31 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 2 starsa bit of a Chancer

A customer from cornwall , 29/03/2007

I like Clive Owen but King Arthur he ain't and never should have been. Unfortunately he is acted off the screen by Ioan Gruffudd and Ray Winstone. The best thing about it were the battle scenes - gory and quite uncompromising, but even then, there are only a limited amount of ways you can decapitate someone. I actually found a lot more humour (perhaps that's just me) than I expected and if you remove Keira Knightley's absurd performance,it stands up quite well as an action film - just forget the story and enjoy some performances from great Bristish actors.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 starsImpressed not

MeTo from Surrey , 12/04/2005

Well, lets see. They changed the entire premise of the King Arthur story in the light of “New evidence” – Oh yeah. ??! God knows why!

They changed the nationality of the heroes - now for some insane reason Arthur and his knights now come from Russia! They changed the characters for good to bad - Merlin is now the bad guy! They changed the violence - now there is enough blood in every scene to fill a bath!

But don't worry; if after seeing the film you do not understand the story of King Arthur, don't worry, it is clear the director didn't understand it either.

If you are lining up to see this film, change queues!

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews