Skip over navigation

Help

A Sound Of Thunder on DVD (2005)

A Sound Of Thunder cover art
Play A Sound Of Thunder trailer
Average rating: (51%)
365129208611
2.5
 
Starring: Edward Burns | Ben Kingsley | Catherine McCormack | Jemima Rooper | David Oyelowo
Director: Peter Hyams
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Run time: 97 mins
Certificate: 12
User collections: Pleb Dazzlers
Genres: Action/Adventure | Sci-Fi/Fantasy
Languages: English
Released: 04/09/2006

Brief synopsis of A Sound Of Thunder

In A SOUND OF THUNDER, based on a short story by Ray Bradbury, director Peter Hyams (END OF DAYS, TIMECOP) creates a world where time travel is possible and life as we know it is threatened. In the year 2055, Charles Hatton's (Ben Kingsley) company, Time Safari, will take anyone with a big enough wallet back 65 million years for the thrill of their lives: dinosaur hunting. Thanks to Tammy, a talking computer created by Dr. Sonia Rand (Catherine McCormack), the time-travel team returns with clients to a specific moment 65 million years ago, with explicit directions not to leave anything behind, change anything, or bring anything with them back to the future. Expedition leader Travis Ryer (Ed Burns) is certain that the protocol is flawless, but Dr. Rand isn't so sure. She knows that Hatton will cut any corners necessary to make bigger bucks, and she's waiting for the worst. Sure enough, a safari goes amiss when Ryer’s gun malfunctions and he sends the clients scampering for cover from an irate dinosaur. The team returns to 2055 shaken but unscathed. The next day, all over Chicago, mysterious trees and vines begin springing up through sidewalks and out of walls. It seems that something went terribly wrong on the last jump, but no one can pinpoint just what it was. According to Rand, the problem will only worsen as "time waves" continue to sweep the planet, resulting in 65 million years of evolution and growth catching up with the present time. Soon, monstrous creatures--giant baboons with lizard-like features, bat-faced teradactyls, and huge sea serpents--abound, leaving Ryer and his team in constant danger as they fight the clock to determine what caused the anomaly and to save life as we know it.

Related

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 3 starsSome good sfx, but a poor transfer to DVD

A customer from Birmingham, UK , 21/05/2006

This film cost in the region of $80 million, and had a limited theatrical release in the US, but bombed at the box office. A pity, because if you consider it as a 'straight-to-DVD' film it is quite impressive as the budget allows some good CGI creatures. The film concerns an unscrupulous businessman who uses time-travel capability to send big game hunters back in time to hunt dinosaurs which were on the point of dying/being killed anyway, so history and causality are not effected. After an accident one hunter accidentally brings back a dead butterfly from the past, and then 'waves of time' start to change current reality. Mutated creatures and evolved dinosaurs start to take up residence, and somehow our heroes have to go back and stop the accident from happening. The film is based on a short story by Ray Bradbury but he distanced himself from the film. My main gripe with the DVD is that the film transfer is very dark, and in some scenes it is difficult to see what is going on!

  10 out of 12 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsGood B-movie Fun!

Nicola from Sleaford,Lincolnshire , 03/09/2006

For a film to fail,and have bad reviews,it really must be bad,but this film isnt bad at all.

Infact in Bmovie style its very entertaining critics just jump on the bandwagon,as they have no imagination themselves.

time travel in the vein of the butterfly effect,but with dinosaurs and all manner of mayhem ensuing after an item is brought back from the past which affects and alters the future.

if you must watch a time travel movie watch this rather than the dire,time machine remake with Guy Pearce(see my other reviews) based on a short story by Ray Bradbury,which im sure was done in the 2000ad comic,Edward Burns,and a very strange Ben Kingsley star along side Catherine Mcormack.

  5 out of 6 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsThunder? More like Blunder......

piggyfidler from Surrey [Highly rated reviewer] , 09/12/2006

More cliches than a cliche lovers convention; worse acting than a brazillian soap opera and special effects sooooooo bad in places that they would be laughable in a TV commercial. This is almost worth watching because it's so bad. It gets one star which I have awarded to myself for heroism in sitting through this clap trap.

  4 out of 4 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 0 starsMajestically awful

DJMattyK from Waddesdon , 02/07/2007

1. Ben Kingsley's wig.

2. That irritating actress with a HUGE CHIN and a face like a shovel getting eaten by the worst special effect in the film

3. Every single other appalling special effect including a dinosaur made of rubber and a treadmill in front of a green screen.

3. The monkey dinosaurs (I'm not kidding)

4. The batodactyls (Seriously)

5. The hastily spoken dialogue, purely utilitarian and simply to speed through the plot details as soon as humanly possible.

6. Ben Kingsley's wig, which is so good it needs mentioning twice.

7. The lack of explanation as to how crushing a butterfly in prehistory can lead to the downfall of man in 2055. I get the whole 'butterfly effect' thing, but this is the most tenuous contrivance in the history of cinema.

8. All of the acting.

9. Need I go on.

ASOT makes Ashton Kutchers 'no armed performance' in The Butterfily Effect look like Olivier.

If you enjoy the failings of others then you could do far worse than watch this film. If you found it to be thought provoking and exciting, then you are a pleb.

  3 out of 3 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 3 starsA Sound of Thunder

Ivorson from Exeter , 18/08/2008

This film has a nice premise, and good effects, with plenty of action but poor character development leaves you a little cold.

Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews